If you come in my cage I'll eat you too!

Sunday, November 19, 2006

There is nothing hypocritical in not supporting gay marriage while enjoying sex with gay male prostitutes!

I am so through with these gay commentators bitching about the hypocrisy of gay politicians who do not support gay marriage. These guys are not getting massages because they can't marry some other guy. Marriage is about companionship and the nurturing of children. No one is stopping gays from being friends with members of the same sex. Getting a massage from a gay prostitute is about getting your rocks off. You don't do it because you can't get married. Most clients of massage parlors are probably already married. The 2 have nothing what-so-ever to do with each other. The gay congressman probably loves his wife, but is sexually aroused by men. Maybe the closeted gay congressmen are less hypocritical than the gays getting married. The gay guys getting married pretend its about love when its really about sex. You may not know this about me, but I support lesbian marriage. Marriage is really for women and children. Men marrying each other is ridiculous. Men have enough power already without pooling resources.


At 2:15 AM , Blogger tooners said...

interesting way to look at it. what about elton john and his partner? do you think they married only for sex? i wonder about this and find that i'm torn. but, i have known and have been friends w/ many gay guys and i do know that most of it is all about sex, like you say, whereas for the girls it is not.

At 11:01 AM , Blogger gary said...

First of all I am against gay marriage--gays have suffered enough. I do think that when gays get married it's about love--they can have sex without getting married, as God intended.Two girls is hot, but only if the girls are hot. I am a big fan of "South of Nowhere" which is all about teen-age lesbianism.

At 4:33 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think that the main reason because gay men marry is that they're snobs. When they're married, they can practice what in Spanish is called "pareja abierta". I don't know the translation. BTW, almost none gay men have intention of marring, at least in Spain, where the gay marriage is legalized.

Of course, I agree with you, Miss C, when you say that there’s not hypocrisy in not supporting gay marriage while enjoying gay sex. In fact, not all openly gay men support the gay marriage. Of course, the hypocrisy resides in claiming against gay sex while enjoying gay sex...

At 4:46 PM , Blogger Miss Carnivorous said...

Yes it is about sex with Elton, but for his husband it was about getting his hands on Elton's money and it's sex with Zontar, for sure.

At 9:17 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

J.Doe, I think the literal translation is "open pair" or "open couple". If I'm not mistaken, in English we would call it "an open marriage" or there's always menage-à-trois.

At 7:39 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have some lesbian friends and a few friends that I think are gay or are gay and just don't know it (yet).

I am against G & L marriage, but not because I don't want them to BE married.

The state has a vestited interest in fostering long-term success of the state. This has traditionaly been through a family that reproduces and participates in the economic welfare of the state. Gay marriages typically do not do this.

If you think about it, G & Ls have the same rights as everyone else. They want exclusive rights which causes some other far reaching legal reprocussions. We have to be careful about recognizing people as minority groups and how it impacts us legally and financially.

And I don't buy into the argument that G & L people come from hetero families so the inverse must be true for children of G & L couples. Children brought up in G & L relationships are subject to ridicule and other situations that most people do not deem to be normal. But what is normal, anyway?

At 10:51 AM , Blogger Miss Carnivorous said...

I have to agree with you on most points Brad. However I see the 2 lesbians that live across from me doing everything in their power to raise their adopted grandson make a lot of sacrifices and pool resources. I do not see gay men doing that. The minute one of them spots a cuter guy, its off he goes.

The guy that won the Nobel Prize for the micro loans was talking the other day about how much better off a family in India became when he gave the money to the women instead of the men. He said that the women would tell him to give it to the men and the men would waste the money on themselves.

Men are not biologically nurturing. I am not saying that they don't love their kids, but they love them in their own way. Lesbians can make a family. I saw a special on Gay families and there was a lesbian couple. One woman had a daughter and the other had a son. The bull dyke one had the daughter and she was clueless as to how to deal with the girl's femininity. The lipstick lesbian had a son. The boy was so happy with his mom getting together with the dykey woman, because she liked to do guy things, like fish and work on cars and stuff. The daughter could talk to her mom's new girlfriend about fashion and makeup. Not as many men want to take on other men's children. It's not biologically beneficial to them. I can count good stepfathers on one finger. The bad ones I have known are legion.

At 6:09 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

n. said:
J.Doe, I think the literal translation is "open pair" or "open couple". If I'm not mistaken, in English we would call it "an open marriage" or there's always menage-à-trois.

Thanks, N. Well, it sounds fine, "open couple" and "open marriage". I am speaking about... you know... about those couples whose members can have sex freely with other people without the other one's presence. I suppose that I can understand the menage-à-trois, but the open marriage sounds ridicule to my ears...


Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home