Carnivorousness

If you come in my cage I'll eat you too!

Sunday, January 21, 2007

The unwritten constitution by Thomas Brewton

§ The Unwritten Constitution
The United States was founded on the Judeo-Christian ethic that historically was the substance of Western civilization. Ours was a specifically English conception of individual morality and individual responsibility that, only in England and its North American colonies, had produced a government of laws, not men, a government in which even the king is subject to the statutes of the land and to a higher moral law.
This conception of government necessitates a citizenry self-regulated by moral precepts that are preserved and taught by religion. The government must similarly be restrained by the limits of natural law, which say that no legitimate government may infringe any individual's rights to life, liberty, and private property.
No society can survive without a consensus about right and wrong, about what constitutes moral conduct. That consensus is the unwritten constitution of society, the content that gives meaning to a written constitution, the meat on the bones of the structure of government.
Opposing our original conception of government is the liberal jihad, driven by the ideology of socialism, sometimes called The Religion of Humanity. This religion was formalized in the 1789 French Revolution, the same year that our Constitution was ratified and became the law of the land.
Socialism is a secular religion. Like Islamic suicide bombers, liberals are so firmly persuaded that their cause is right, good, and just that they are prepared to go to any lengths necessary to destroy the Judeo-Christian ethic of individual morality and replace it with a rigidly regulated National-State collectivism, of which Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia were extreme examples.
The religion of socialism is being taught unconstitutionally, at your expense, in public schools and colleges receiving Federal aid. Teaching the religious doctrine of socialism as scientific fact amounts to making liberal-socialism the officially established religion of the United States.
The only constitutional way to stop the liberal jihad is to force schools to present both sides of the story, traditionalist, as well as liberal. Publicly funded schools now teach only the amoral, secular materialism of the socialist religion. Schools no longer present true versions of American history and of our original ideas of civic virtue and personal morality that are historically the substance of Western civilization. Penetrating the shield of socialist teachers' unions and the politicians whom they help elect is a very long-term project, but a vital one.
The largest volume of immigration in the nation's history, both legal and illegal, coupled with liberals' relentless efforts to destroy America's original traditions of individual morality, leaves us with no core values and a diminishing will to defend ourselves against foreign enemies

5 Comments:

At 6:05 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

You hit the nail on the head, Miss C. You should be a Presidential speechwriter.

 
At 8:43 AM , Blogger gary said...

You are saying that the only way to have freedom is to force the teaching of religion in the public schools? That is positively Orwellian.

 
At 10:54 AM , Blogger Miss Carnivorous said...

Gary, Noah, I did not write this. As for teaching religion, Nancy Pelosi's daughter hits the nail on the head when she says if you don't give your kids some religion when they are young, they will be religious wackos when they are older!

 
At 11:26 AM , Blogger gary said...

One of my favorite quotes, which applies to religion, is from Bertrand Russell:

“I wish to propose for the reader’s favourable consideration a doctrine which may, I fear, appear wildly paradoxical and subversive. The doctrine in question is this: that it is undesirable to believe a proposition when there is no ground whatever for supposing it true.”

 
At 12:37 PM , Blogger Miss Carnivorous said...

Ah yes but that is what makes a religion. Faith consists of belief where there is no proof. Religous nuts consider themselves superior for believing in something that can not be prooved. Just like the belief in the benefits of Marxism.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home