If you come in my cage I'll eat you too!

Sunday, February 10, 2008

JFK was shot in the back of the head, In the Zapruder film you can see blood spraying out the right front of his head

People are often wrongfully convicted of murder after a spouse commits suicide. People who do not know the difference between entry and exit wounds often mistake one for the other. In small towns, coroners who have never seen a gunshot wound may be confused as to which is the entry and which is the exit. When Oswald shot Kennedy, the use of high powered amunition by civilians was rare. Few people could be expected to know or understand what actually happened.
Above are Red Cross photos that are meant to help investigators responsible for prosecuting war crimes during armed conflict. They explain entry and exit wounds. The entry wounds are tiny and the blowout from the bullets' exits are huge. This is exactly what happened to Kennedy's head when Oswald shot him. If Kennedy's body was not lying down you would see that the exit wound was all forward. The bullet exploded his skull forward and outward.

I believe that the explosion of his bone and brain matter caused his head to snap sideways. It cracks me up to see that some of the conspiracy theorists think that the driver of Kennedy's vehicle shot him.

I once saw a court case where a poor Mexican immigrant was accused of shooting his wife in the back when she actually had shot herself in the stomach. The coroner had never seen a gunshot wound before, just like all the conspiracy theorists who are mostly lefty pacifists anyway.
I recently had an argument with a guy who claimed to have seen a blonde woman pointing at a "CIA" agent with a smoking gun in the Zapruder film of the Kennedy assasination. Modern guns don't smoke don't smoke, so he must have been holding an ancient, black powder gun. He said that the "CIA" agent had blue eyes and blonde hair also. He saw this film on TV when he was 14, right after the assassination. I asked him what a "CIA" agent looked like. I also told him that all TV's were black and white at the time Kennedy was shot (well according to Wiki only 3.1% of households had color sets by 1964 and they were horrifically expensive) and he was describing things in color.
Then he started to go off and say Kennedy was shot in the front of the head and that he wouldn't "lie" to me, but he was concerned because I was in danger and didn't even know it, because of the trial I served as a juror on.
Crazy, crazy, crazy. Like all conspiracy theorists. He also claimed that Kennedy's secret service men were taken off the job that day. I told him "Sure they were, and all the jews were told to leave the Trade Center on 9/11." "That's true too" he said. He also admitted to me that he almost became a State Trooper but could not conceive of carrying a gun. So a guy who knows nothing about firearms is still expert on entry and exit wounds.


At 3:33 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

08/25/07 "The Independent" -- - Each time I lecture abroad on the Middle East, there is always someone in the audience – just one – whom I call the "raver". Apologies here to all the men and women who come to my talks with bright and pertinent questions – often quite humbling ones for me as a journalist – and which show that they understand the Middle East tragedy a lot better than the journalists who report it. But the "raver" is real. He has turned up in corporeal form in Stockholm and in Oxford, in Sao Paulo and in Yerevan, in Cairo, in Los Angeles and, in female form, in Barcelona. No matter the country, there will always be a "raver".

His – or her – question goes like this. Why, if you believe you're a free journalist, don't you report what you really know about 9/11? Why don't you tell the truth – that the Bush administration (or the CIA or Mossad, you name it) blew up the twin towers? Why don't you reveal the secrets behind 9/11? The assumption in each case is that Fisk knows – that Fisk has an absolute concrete, copper-bottomed fact-filled desk containing final proof of what "all the world knows" (that usually is the phrase) – who destroyed the twin towers. Sometimes the "raver" is clearly distressed. One man in Cork screamed his question at me, and then – the moment I suggested that his version of the plot was a bit odd – left the hall, shouting abuse and kicking over chairs.

Usually, I have tried to tell the "truth"; that while there are unanswered questions about 9/11, I am the Middle East correspondent of The Independent, not the conspiracy correspondent; that I have quite enough real plots on my hands in Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Iran, the Gulf, etc, to worry about imaginary ones in Manhattan. My final argument – a clincher, in my view – is that the Bush administration has screwed up everything – militarily, politically diplomatically – it has tried to do in the Middle East; so how on earth could it successfully bring off the international crimes against humanity in the United States on 11 September 2001?

Well, I still hold to that view. Any military which can claim – as the Americans did two days ago – that al-Qa'ida is on the run is not capable of carrying out anything on the scale of 9/11. "We disrupted al-Qa'ida, causing them to run," Colonel David Sutherland said of the preposterously code-named "Operation Lightning Hammer" in Iraq's Diyala province. "Their fear of facing our forces proves the terrorists know there is no safe haven for them." And more of the same, all of it untrue.

Within hours, al-Qa'ida attacked Baquba in battalion strength and slaughtered all the local sheikhs who had thrown in their hand with the Americans. It reminds me of Vietnam, the war which George Bush watched from the skies over Texas – which may account for why he this week mixed up the end of the Vietnam war with the genocide in a different country called Cambodia, whose population was eventually rescued by the same Vietnamese whom Mr Bush's more courageous colleagues had been fighting all along.

But – here we go. I am increasingly troubled at the inconsistencies in the official narrative of 9/11. It's not just the obvious non sequiturs: where are the aircraft parts (engines, etc) from the attack on the Pentagon? Why have the officials involved in the United 93 flight (which crashed in Pennsylvania) been muzzled? Why did flight 93's debris spread over miles when it was supposed to have crashed in one piece in a field? Again, I'm not talking about the crazed "research" of David Icke's Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster – which should send any sane man back to reading the telephone directory.

I am talking about scientific issues. If it is true, for example, that kerosene burns at 820C under optimum conditions, how come the steel beams of the twin towers – whose melting point is supposed to be about 1,480C – would snap through at the same time? (They collapsed in 8.1 and 10 seconds.) What about the third tower – the so-called World Trade Centre Building 7 (or the Salmon Brothers Building) – which collapsed in 6.6 seconds in its own footprint at 5.20pm on 11 September? Why did it so neatly fall to the ground when no aircraft had hit it? The American National Institute of Standards and Technology was instructed to analyse the cause of the destruction of all three buildings. They have not yet reported on WTC 7. Two prominent American professors of mechanical engineering – very definitely not in the "raver" bracket – are now legally challenging the terms of reference of this final report on the grounds that it could be "fraudulent or deceptive".

Journalistically, there were many odd things about 9/11. Initial reports of reporters that they heard "explosions" in the towers – which could well have been the beams cracking – are easy to dismiss. Less so the report that the body of a female air crew member was found in a Manhattan street with her hands bound. OK, so let's claim that was just hearsay reporting at the time, just as the CIA's list of Arab suicide-hijackers, which included three men who were – and still are – very much alive and living in the Middle East, was an initial intelligence error.

But what about the weird letter allegedly written by Mohamed Atta, the Egyptian hijacker-murderer with the spooky face, whose "Islamic" advice to his gruesome comrades – released by the CIA – mystified every Muslim friend I know in the Middle East? Atta mentioned his family – which no Muslim, however ill-taught, would be likely to include in such a prayer. He reminds his comrades-in-murder to say the first Muslim prayer of the day and then goes on to quote from it. But no Muslim would need such a reminder – let alone expect the text of the "Fajr" prayer to be included in Atta's letter.

Let me repeat. I am not a conspiracy theorist. Spare me the ravers. Spare me the plots. But like everyone else, I would like to know the full story of 9/11, not least because it was the trigger for the whole lunatic, meretricious "war on terror" which has led us to disaster in Iraq and Afghanistan and in much of the Middle East. Bush's happily departed adviser Karl Rove once said that "we're an empire now – we create our own reality". True? At least tell us. It would stop people kicking over chairs.

At 3:35 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Almost no tv set in the 60s... Ok but what about 2001 ? No one had a video camera in downtown that september day ?

At 4:38 PM , Blogger Miss Carnivorous said...

People did have video cameras in NY on 9/11 and they did take pics. As for the supposed controlled demolition style fall of the two buildings, watch actual filmed demolitions. They are nothing like the trade center falls. The buildings of 9/11 fall from the top, collapsing one floor after another, pancaking. Controlled demolitions take out a few floors from the bottom, first. They fall from the bottom down. The trade center steel weakended by heating and collapsed like the recent freeway overpass did here in the bay area. After the burning floors began to collapse the weight of the top floors took down the lower floors. The steel also bent like that during the Loma Prieta earthquake. You can see the steel beams of the Trade Center look just like the beams on the cypress freeway collapse.

Conspiracies are impossible to keep secret. If the Jews had been told to leave the Trade center before the "fake" attack, don't you think that one or more would be touring the country with an ACLU attorney? Jews are so damn liberal and downright lefty that it isn't funny. They are always guilt tripping any way, you know they'd be guilt tripping about surviving the 9/11 attacks.

At 12:51 PM , Blogger ricpic said...

Nothing will stop people kicking over chairs because people like kicking over chairs.

At 8:19 AM , Blogger staghounds said...

Here's a reenactment, with exploding honeydew melon.

At 7:23 PM , Blogger Miss Carnivorous said...

I saw a gelatin ballistics test. It shows what happened in Kennedy's brain. UGH.... The bullet lost energy and the energy was transerred to the brain matter, crazy cool. All the Kennedy's were creepy anyway, those horrible voices.

At 3:26 AM , Blogger Xiaozhengm 520 said...

2015-10-7 xiaozhengm
Michael Kors Factory Outlet Online Official
celine bag
Abercrombie Short T-Shirts
michael kors outlet online
Designer Louis Vuitton Handbags Online
uggs on sale
Louis Vuitton Bags Original
michael kors handbags
Jordan Retro 13 Pink And Grey
Air Jordan Shoes For Women And Men
hermes bags
Jordan Retro 8 Playoffs
michael kors bags
Abercrombie and Co Stoves and Awnings
Red Bottom Shoes Christian Louboutin
Authentic Coach Factory Outlet Online
ugg boots on sale
Louis Vuitton Backpack Purse
ralph lauren
Louis Vuitton Outlet Factory Online
hollister uk sale
louis vuitton outlet stores
Authentic Louis Vuitton Monogram Handbag
Michael Kors Outlet Online USA Stores
louis vuitton handbags
Ugg Boots,Ugg Boots Outlet,Ugg Outlet,Cheap Uggs,Uggs On Sale,Ugg Boots Clearance,Uggs For Women
Air Jordan 4 Green Glow
true religion outlet
Louis Vuitton Bags On Sale Cheap
Authentic Gucci Factory Outlet
cheap jerseys
Louis Vuitton Outlet High Quality
canada goose jackets
Louis Vuitton Neverfull GM Monogram

At 11:04 PM , Blogger Zheng junxai5 said...

abercrombie outlet
replica rolex watches
cheap jordans
air jordan shoes
adidas superstar trainers
ray ban outlet
coach factory outlet
cheap air jordans
gucci outlet
kobe 10
beats by dr dre
ray ban sunglasses outlet
oakley canada
coach factory outlet online
louis vuitton purses
true religion jeans
hollister clearance
nike blazers uk
coach outlet store
hollister clothing store
louis vuitton purses
michael kors outlet
marc jacobs outlet
louis vuitton outlet online
oakley sunglasses
jordan retro 13
michael kors outlet
michael kors outlet online
air jordan shoes
burberry handbags
michael kors outlet online
ray bans
coach outlet
michael kors outlet
toms outlet
michael kors outlet
louis vuitton outlet stores
jordan shoes
cheap oakleys


Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home