If you come in my cage I'll eat you too!

Tuesday, October 16, 2007

On the proposed installation of video cameras in San Francisco

The San Francisco mayoral candidates had radio time this weekend to speak about their proposed policies should they be elected mayor. One of the questions the candidtates all had to answer was on whether the city should install video cameras to deter crime. All the candidates, even the wacky nudist one, reluctantly admitted that cameras deter red light runners.

Two of the Black candidates said that crime was their number one priority. One of them, a woman, was somewhat Black nationalistic in tone. She said that instead of cameras, the city should install more street lighting. She received loud applause and cheers for this revolutionary statement.

The only problem is this, during the trial Miss C served as a juror on one "Litter Enforcement Officer" mentioned that a common area for dumping of stolen vehicles, "Was impossible to keep lit by street lights, as the criminals shoot or break them out as fast as the city can install and replace them."

Once again, reality trumps liberal la la land.


At 10:30 PM , Anonymous karen said...

Would they shoot the cameras as well or are they well hidden?

At 8:00 AM , Blogger staghounds said...

Hiding them doesn't help- the locals know where they are. I expect in most "safe" urban areas, cameras would survive simply because the criminals don't spend much time doing evil there.

In the tax financed criminal playgrounds, cameras are just targets.

At 12:06 PM , Blogger Miss Carnivorous said...

If they do shoot them out, they'll have a pic of them doing it.

At 8:44 PM , Anonymous jack said...

What ... is SF a police state?

Cameras documneting crimes. Dems will never allow that!

Blatant invasion of privacy ... I say!

At 10:55 PM , Anonymous karen said...

Assuming they don't blast the camera to pieces.


Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home